Ты почитай там ещё комментарии. Люди толково пишут

TdeF

August 1, 2019 at 4:11 pm · Reply

Good. Agree with it all. Especially Boondoggle and Gravy train. Denying man made Global Warming would have everyone in atmospheric science looking for jobs or funds for their computers and projects.

He speaks though solely as a lifelong expert Atmospheric Scientist and about cosmic rays, earth’s magnetic field, induced low cloud cover. His specialities.
Whatever the explanation for the patterns of warming and cooling there is no need for CO2 warming and no proof at all. He joins a long list of retired scientists who have called out this nonsense presented as settled science.

At the same time there is this continuing presumption that the CO2 increase was a consequence of the Industrial revolution. Even the most senior scientists take this as a given and without any evidence at all. This is despite the fact that the amount of man made CO2 can be simply measured and there is very little. That should have been the end of this incredible hypothesis in 1988 before it even started.

Even if the 50% increase in CO2 was in fact man made, most scientists then go on to conclude CO2 is irrelevant.

My point is that most do not stop to consider they have tacitly accepted the hypothesis of man made CO2. This is the real swindle on which this whole massively expensive and destructive business relies. However each debunks it from their own field of expertise as unnecessary or simply not true.

The only connection between increased CO2 and the industrial revolution is a suggestion of rough coincidence. Consider also that CO2 caused warming is harder to explain than that warming produces more CO2 in the air. What ties them together is that most of the world’s CO2 is dissolved under high pressure in the ocean but few upper atmospheric scientists care much about what is in the ocean. For them it’s cosmic rays and low cloud.
For less specialized scientists is it Henry’s law which says if you heat the ocean surface, CO2 goes up. This does not explain the heating but does easily explain the higher CO2 and also explains the pause. Incidentally no one tries to explain how more CO2 heats the ocean, significant since increased CO2 is supposed to be responsible for bleaching parts of our Great Barrier Reef. Somehow.

I would also suggest that most scientists never considered dating CO2 itself. Dating usually applies to wood and teeth and other organic matter. Anything in the biosphere carbon cycle. You can date it all. It takes some lateral thinking to consider dating CO2. That applies to methane too.

So it’s a bit disappointing to hear such an eminent physicist ignoring this fact but otherwise he is speaking from immense senior experience. Who on earth would rather get their advice from science ignorant Al Gore?
As for doddering septuagenarians Al Gore (71), Elizabeth Warren(70), Jeremy Corbyn(70) , Bernie Sanders(77), Nancy Pelosi(78), are comparable to Donald Trump(73). It’s interesting that no one attacks Donald Trump on his age or as a reason for him not to run for another term. In most professions they would be retired too.

So why do politicians care about Climate Change? Because half of them are socialists and it is in their manual. These are people who work with instructions. On the left of politics, you are not allowed think for yourself. So in the Democratic candidates debate, they are only competing as to who is the most ‘Woke’ and who hates the Republicans and Donald Trump the most. It’s almost funny, except that it’s serious.