Нач еинер ам Самстаг верöффентличтен Умфраге дес Фернсехсендерс АБЦ унд дер Тагесзеитунг "Вашингтон Пост" спрач сич мит 51 Прозент дер Бефрагтен ерстмалс еине Мехрхеит фüр еинен Ирак-Криег ауч охне Уно-Мандат аус.
Скажем Опрос АБЦ подробнее выгладит вот так:
<
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/vault/stories/data020603.htm
Washingtonpost.com - ABC News Poll: Powell's U.N. Address
Thursday, February 6, 2003
The latest Washingtonpost.com-ABC News poll is based on telephone interviews with 504 randomly selected adults nationwide and was conducted Wednesday evening, February 5. The margin of sampling error for overall results is plus or minus 5 percentage points. Sampling error is only one of many potential sources of error in this or any other public opinion poll. Results of overnight polls that attempt to measure opinions about fast-changing news events should be interpreted with extra caution. Interviewing was conducted by TNS Intersearch of Horsham, Pa.
*= less than 0.5 percent
1. Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling the situation with Iraq and Saddam Hussein?
Approve Disapprove No opinion
2/5/03 61 32 7
2/1/03 61 35 3
1/28/03 58 38 4
1/27/03 57 40 3
1/20/03 50 46 4
12/15/02 58 37 5
11/4/02 LV 56 40 4
11/3/02 LV 57 40 4
11/2/02 LV 56 41 3
10/27/02 All 57 38 5
10/27/02 LV 61 37 3
9/26/02 58 39 3
9/14/02 65 31 4
8/29/02 52 36 12
2. Would you favor or oppose having U.S. forces take military action against Iraq to force Saddam Hussein from power? Would you say you favor/oppose military action against Iraq strongly or only somewhat?
----------Favor---------- ----------Oppose---------- No
NET Strongly Somewhat NET Strongly Somewhat opin.
2/5/03 67 45 22 27 17 11 6
2/1/03 66 48 19 31 18 14 3
1/28/03 63 43 19 32 20 13 5
1/27/03 61 40 21 36 21 15 3
1/20/03 57 40 17 41 25 16 3
12/15/02 62 41 20 35 20 15 3
11/17/02 64 NA NA 29 NA NA 7
9/26/02 61 NA NA 34 NA NA 5
9/14/02 68 NA NA 29 NA NA 3
8/29/02 56 NA NA 34 NA NA 10
8/11/02 69 NA NA 22 NA NA 9
3/10/02 72 NA NA 24 NA NA 4
2/21/02 67 46 21 30 12 18 4
1/27/02 71 NA NA 24 NA NA 4
12/19/01 72 NA NA 24 NA NA 5
11/27/01 78 NA NA 17 NA NA 6
10/11/94* 72 NA NA 23 NA NA 5
1/15/93** 82 NA NA 15 NA NA 3
8/21/92 RV 65 NA NA 30 NA NA 5
2/9/92 62 NA NA 35 NA NA 3
4/22/91 51 NA NA 43 NA NA 6
4/5/91 54 NA NA 37 NA NA 9
3/15/91 57 NA NA 38 NA NA 5
*10/11/94 and previous: Gallup
**1/15/93 and previous: Would you support or oppose having U.S. forces
resume military action...?
3. (IF FAVOR, Q2) What if the United Nations opposes such action - in that case would you favor or oppose having U.S. forces take military action against Iraq?
Q2/3 NET
Favor Oppose No opinion
2/5/03 49 46 5
2/1/03 51 46 3
1/28/03 46 50 4
1/27/03 44 52 3
Compare to:
Would you favor or oppose having U.S. forces take military action against Iraq, even if the United Nations opposes such action?
Favor Oppose No opinion
12/15/02 37 58 5
4. Do you think the Bush administration has or has not presented enough evidence to show why the United States should use military force to remove Saddam Hussein from power?
Enough Not enough No opinion
2/5/03 61 34 5
2/1/03 54 41 4
1/20/03 48 47 6
5. Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the United Nations about Iraq today. Did you happen to watch or listen to that speech, or hear or read any news reports about it, or not?
Yes No No opinion
2/5/03 61 39 0
6. Do you think Powell did or did not make a convincing case for going to war with Iraq?
Yes No No opinion
2/5/03 50 19 31
7. Overall, do you think Powell presented hard evidence PROVING that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction; or circumstantial evidence SUGGESTING that Iraq has these weapons, but not proving it?
Hard Circumstantial No
evidence evidence opinion
2/5/03 42 31 26
8. Do you think the United States has or has not presented strong evidence showing that Iraq (READ ITEM)?
2/5/03 Summary Table:
Has Has not No opin.
a. has chemical and biological weapons 71 23 6
b. is trying to develop nuclear weapons 61 30 10
c. has provided direct support to the
Al Qaeda terrorist group 49 37 14
d. is not cooperating with the United
Nations weapons inspectors 73 22 4
9. Before deciding whether to attack Iraq, how much longer do you think the administration should give the United Nations weapons inspectors to search for chemical, biological and nuclear weapons there - a few weeks, a few months, or more than that?
Less than a A few A few More No
few weeks (vol.) weeks months than that opin.
2/5/03 15 44 28 10 3
2/1/03 10 41 33 13 3
10. What do you think is more important - (for the United States to move quickly against Iraq, even if that means acting without international support,0); or (for the United States to gain international support, even if that delays action against Iraq)?
Move Gain No
quickly support opinion
2/5/03 41 55 5
1/27/03 31 64 5
╘ Copyright 2003 The Washington Post Company
>
Kaum jemand will die Wahrheit hören, aber alle wollen sie gerne aussprechen.