Именно выводы комиссии на предмет "Ukraine’s airspace management" я и цитирую, из заключения. Вы же цитируете выводы в отношении маршрутов полета, да еще и в странном варианте. Вот оригинал:
The aviation parties involved did not adequately recognise the risks of the armed conflict in the eastern part of Ukraine to overflying civil aviation.
– During the period prior to the crash of flight MH17, the armed conflict in the eastern part of Ukraine expanded into the airspace. Consequently, the risks to overflying civil aviation increased.
– The statements made by the Ukrainian authorities in which they reported that military aeroplanes had been shot down on 14 and 16 July, and in which they mentioned weapon systems that were able to reach cruising altitude of civil aeroplanes, provided sufficient reason for closing the airspace above the eastern part of Ukraine as a precaution.
– The other parties involved - operators, the states in which they are based and third parties such as ICAO - did not identify potential risks posed by the armed conflict in the eastern part of Ukraine to civil aviation. Operators, including Malaysia Airlines, assumed that the open parts of Ukrainian airspace were safe. States did not issue any specific warnings about risks to civil aviation during the period in which the conflict expanded into the airspace. ICAO did not see any reason for questioning Ukraine or offer assistance.
Про ответственность в целом повторюсь, никто ее равнозначной не объявлял.