Login
Русские дети Латвии
2444 просмотров
Перейти к просмотру всей ветки
in Antwort Mood 29.07.04 00:48
>Я попросил Участника привести линки на Документы , где выражалось бы мнение Государств Мира к присоединению Латвии к СССР, как "агрессия" или "оккупация".
Since 1940 the Western Powers refused to recognize de jure the Baltic States as a part of the Soviet Union. This kind of policy was grounded on the doctrine worded in 1932 by State Secretary of the USA, Henry Stimson, according to which the USA did not recognize the lawfulness of territorial changes made by force and contrary to the will of a local nation. The doctrine-based political influence on the other Western Powers was rather diverse, on which depended also the destiny of the Baltic States legations after the year 1940.
The best status for the legations of the Baltic States was in the USA where they enjoyed continuously de jure recognition. In Great Britain the Baltic legations had also diplomatic status but on the insistence of the English they were forced to act reservedly. The Baltic legations in Switzerland held a so-called de facto ad hoc recognition. The members of the legations retained personal diplomatic status and they carried on rather energetic activity 2.
Despite the fact that the government of Great Britain was favourable to the independence of the Baltic States, it was agreed in the world war situation to recognize de facto the occupation of these countries in order to avoid conflict with the Soviet Union. Before signing the alliance pact between the Soviet Union and Great Britain against Germany on May 26, 1942, there was also a strong opinion in the British Foreign Office to recognize de jure the occupation of the Baltic States
http://www.tellur.ru/~historia/archive/06-01/made.htm
Since 1940 the Western Powers refused to recognize de jure the Baltic States as a part of the Soviet Union. This kind of policy was grounded on the doctrine worded in 1932 by State Secretary of the USA, Henry Stimson, according to which the USA did not recognize the lawfulness of territorial changes made by force and contrary to the will of a local nation. The doctrine-based political influence on the other Western Powers was rather diverse, on which depended also the destiny of the Baltic States legations after the year 1940.
The best status for the legations of the Baltic States was in the USA where they enjoyed continuously de jure recognition. In Great Britain the Baltic legations had also diplomatic status but on the insistence of the English they were forced to act reservedly. The Baltic legations in Switzerland held a so-called de facto ad hoc recognition. The members of the legations retained personal diplomatic status and they carried on rather energetic activity 2.
Despite the fact that the government of Great Britain was favourable to the independence of the Baltic States, it was agreed in the world war situation to recognize de facto the occupation of these countries in order to avoid conflict with the Soviet Union. Before signing the alliance pact between the Soviet Union and Great Britain against Germany on May 26, 1942, there was also a strong opinion in the British Foreign Office to recognize de jure the occupation of the Baltic States
http://www.tellur.ru/~historia/archive/06-01/made.htm