навязывание ЛГБТ взглядов
Для альтернативно одарённых цитата из последней ссылки, которую я целиком и полностью разделяю: “In addition to these “shabby” GWAS data, there are actually several
interesting observations reported in this paper which might encourage
people to think a little more deeply about “same-sex sexual behavior” as
a biological trait:
Figure 1A. The percentage of same-sex sexual behavior was found to
increase almost 4-fold in 30 years (!) – this is definitely a sign of a
social/cultural trait instead of a biological trait;
Figure 1B. The “reproductive disadvantage” of “same-sex sexual
behavior” was very high – if this were a biological and evolutionary
trait with any substantial genetic contribution, this trait would have
decreased in rate, instead of this 4-fold increase in rate over the past
30 years;
Figure 4. The genetic correlations with risky behavior (e.g.
cannabis use), mental health, and number of sex partners – as well as
the recent staggering 4-fold increase in 30 years – makes me tend to
believe that “same-sex sexual behavior” is not a “primary biological
trait” but rather a “secondary response” (i.e. a behavioral pattern
under a specific cultural environment, e.g. leisure and affluence). My
conclusion is somewhat different from the “politically correct”
statement mentioned in the Wall Street Journal article [...]
Lastly, I believe that “being gay or lesbian or whatever” need not
be, and should not be, vindicated by biology.”